I 100% agree with you! I've taken part in a few Jams already and I feel like it was always an unwritten rule that if someone rates your game, you rate theirs. I think this is the perfect system, it builds a community and rewards people who rate many games themselves. Of course it leads to a higher rating disparity, but I think that's okay - presentation in my opinion is another big part of making a game, and the "old" system rewarded people who put a lot of thought into name, thumbnail, title etc.
Additionally, the big disparity is still there! Some games still have around 30 ratings while others have just 5. Just this time around that's not decided by the effort of the team, be it by socializing or making a good game page, but purely by luck.
I see the argument for this system, and I gotta say: I even enjoyed playing games from my queue! It is true that in other jams I was "pickier", and now I got to enjoy games I would otherwise never have tried. Taking away the community aspect and making everything based on pure randomness has removed quite a bit of the charme from this Jam and left me pretty frustrated...
I hope the rating system gets changed to the old system at a later date to (possibly) get the best of both world. I doubt it though. There has apparently been a lot of discourse on the discord regarding this rating system already, with minimal to no response from anyone associated with the jam.
As a last comment: Thanks for creating this post!








